Tuesday, 13 October 2026 Search Subscribe
Canada House on Cockspur Street in Westminster, with a red London bus passing
Robin Sones, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Whistleblowers could be paid for exposing fraud under SFO reward plan

The Government has launched a consultation on paying whistleblowers who report economic crime, in a scheme the Serious Fraud Office has long called for and which would bring Britain closer to the American model.

Whistleblowers who report economic crime such as fraud and bribery could be paid for the information they provide, under plans being developed by the Serious Fraud Office and put out to public consultation by the Government on Monday.

The move would bring Britain closer to the United States, where financial incentives are used to encourage whistleblowers to provide evidence that can help uncover wrongdoing. The Government said it supports the introduction of an SFO whistleblower incentivisation scheme, to encourage more people to come forward and strengthen the agency's ability to investigate and prosecute serious fraud, bribery and corruption.

Paternoster Square and the surrounding City of London office buildings seen from above
gren, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Paternoster Square in the City of London, beside the London Stock Exchange. The scheme is aimed at insiders who can help uncover fraud and bribery inside companies.

Under the proposals, a whistleblower would be eligible for a reward only if the information provided is significant and original, and leads to a conviction or other enforcement action. The consultation, which runs until 8 January 2027, forms part of wider work on the whistleblowing framework in the Employment Rights Act 1996, which protects workers who report wrongdoing from dismissal and other retaliation by their employer.

We welcome this consultation having long-called for the introduction of a scheme to incentivise whistleblowers.Spokesperson for the Serious Fraud Office

"We welcome this consultation having long-called for the introduction of a scheme to incentivise whistleblowers," a spokesperson for the SFO said. "We encourage all those with a view to contribute to the consultation and we look forward to working with our government partners on next steps."

The proposal follows an independent review of fraud prosecution led by Jonathan Fisher KC, which reported in July and warned that Britain was losing valuable intelligence because whistleblowers chose to report wrongdoing to the American authorities, where they could be financially rewarded. Nick Ephgrave, the former director of the SFO, campaigned for whistleblowers to be paid during his tenure, saying doing so had "many benefits".

The royal coat of arms and Royal Courts of Justice lettering on the building's stone facade
Christine Matthews, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
The royal coat of arms on the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Under the proposals, a reward would be paid only where information leads to a conviction or other enforcement action.

Britain took a first step towards the American approach last year, when HM Revenue and Customs introduced a reward scheme offering informants up to 30 per cent of the tax recovered in major cases. The SFO, whose jurisdiction covers England, Wales and Northern Ireland, investigates and prosecutes the most serious and complex fraud, bribery and corruption cases.

Not everyone in the legal profession is persuaded. Ian Hargreaves, a partner at Quillon Law, said there are mixed views on how effective such incentives will be, with some arguing it is morally problematic to encourage people to blow the whistle for financial reward, and that it should be a public and social duty, without the need to be paid.

Filed under: Economy, Serious Fraud Office, Whistleblowing, Fraud, City, Consultation

Corrections
None to date. The Journal corrects errors promptly and transparently. Read our corrections policy.